Merton
Miller, economics Nobel Laureate and co-author of the Modigliani Miller theory
backed full reserve banking. Here are the final few sentences of his paper “Do
the M&M propositions apply to banks?” (Journal of Banking and Finance).
“Why not just scrap the whole costly
system of deposit insurance, capital requirements plus risk surveillance in
favor of a variant on Irving Fisher's 100 percent money proposal, under which
insured deposits - and no limitation need be placed on the size of the accounts
- must be invested only in short term Treasury bills or their close equivalents?
That will surely guarantee the safety of the payment system and head off any
future taxpayer bailouts. Small and medium-size businesses won't thereby lose
access to bank financing. Banks will simply raise the funds to support their
loan portfolios by issuing non-guaranteed securities of any of a variety of
kinds, like leasing companies or merchant banks now do, at rates reflecting
each bank's risk posture more accurately than any feasible scheme of insurance
premiums. The Fisher plan has other advantages as well, not least, preventing
monetary meltdowns like those of 1930-33. That's why Fisher proposed it in the
first place! And with that major worry removed from their shoulders, the
monetary authorities can begin to take a more positive view of financial
innovation and experimentation. But there's even more good news. Think how much
national economic welfare could rise under Fisher's narrow banking scheme when
thousands of no longer needed bank regulators (and hundreds of academic banking
economists) find themselves forced at last to seek more socially productive
lines of economic activity.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Post a comment.