Martin Wolf in today’s FinancialTimes asks “Why are the high income countries not mired in deflation?”. And one
sentence later he says, “It is weird that inflation has remained so stable,
despite huge falls in output..”.
His answer is that everyone now has
faith in central bank inflation targeting. That is, central banks aim for 2%
inflation, so inflation is actually around 2%.
But that rather begs the question
as to how, given that supply exceeds demand, employees manage stop wages
falling in nominal terms and how employers manage to stop the prices of their
products doing likewise.
As regards wages, pay awards seem
to have averaged about 2.5% in 2010, 2011, and 2012 in the UK (Sources are
below). And that is despite productivity actually FALLING (see chart on p.iii
here, and table 57 on p.59).
So it looks like Keynes’s dictum
about wages being “sticky downwards” was an understatement. That is, employees
like getting their annual 2% or so pay increase REGARDLESS of productivity
increases or lack of.
Employers’ pricing strategies.
As to lack of firms willing to drop
their prices because of lack of demand, I don’t see any “sure fire” answer
there. However, it seems that firms determine their prices to a significant
extent simply by the “mark up on costs” method. That way of determining prices
seems to be about as important as reacting to what the competition is doing
with its prices (see here and here). So presumably the “mark up on costs”
phenomenon is just influential enough to ensure that prices keep up with wage
increases.
____________
Sources for wage increases.
1st quarter 2010. 1.9%
Sept, Oct & Nov 2010: 2.2%
1st quarter 2011. 2.5%
3 months to sept 2012: 2.5%
4th quarter 2011. 2.5%
Whole of 2012. 2.5%
First quarter 2013. 3.5%.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Post a comment.