The price of the average house in Britain (around £160,000)
is artificially inflated to the tune of about £45,000 because of artificial
constraints on the amount of land made available to house builders. That’s
according to this Policy Exchange study. I actually did my own back of the
envelope calculations BEFORE coming across the Policy Exchange study, and got
much the same answer: around £45,000.
So . . cut the amount of bureaucracy involved in getting
planning permission to build houses and the reduction in the cost of housing would
make an owner occupied house unaffordable for many more first time buyers. Plus
there is a saving in the form of fewer bureaucrats for taxpayers to pay for.
But that would be too simple. Instead, the British government
has thought of a more expensive way of making housing more affordable for first
time buyers: it’s to subsidise them.
So while one lot of bureaucrats are busy making it difficult
to build houses, there is another lot of make it easier.
And if you object to more countryside being covered with
concrete and housing estates, then answer this: which political party have you
been voting for for the last ten or fifteen years? On of the main three
parties: Conservative, Labour or Lib Dem? Then you’ve voted for a party which
advocates or turns a blind eye to mass immigration, the main cause of the rise
in demand for housing. You’re getting what you voted for.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Post a comment.