There’s an article in The
Guardian today on the subject of JG entitled “Work for the dole: this punishing
forced labour policy..” by Van Badham.
Badham's first cock up (in
her second paragraph) is to claim that the pay on JG schemes is “sub-poverty-level
subsistence”. Well the problem with that is that remuneration on JG schemes is
normally equal to and sometimes more than unemployment benefit. Thus if the
remuneration really is “sub-poverty”, then that’s the fault of those who
determine benefit levels, no those who design JG schemes.
Next Badhams claims (3rd
paragraph) that the motive of those favouring JG is to “punish the unemployed”.
OK Badham’s motive for writing for The Guardian is that it satisfies that
weird sexual perversion she suffers from. Anyone can attribute daft motives to
others.
And in her 5th
paragraph she waxes lyrical about the deprivations suffered by those on
unemployment benefit. Well that’s nothing to do with JG is it?
The woman is a moron. I
can’t be bothered finishing the article.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Post a comment.