“People who
lose their jobs after many years of work would receive higher benefits than
those who have not held down a career under proposals being drawn up by Labour.”
So says the opening paragraph of a report on p.2 of today’s Financial Times
(1).
I could have
phrased that a bit better and as follows.
People who
have spent years holding the country to ransom with a view to obtaining
unwarranted job security in the unionised, Labour supporting public sector will
be additionally rewarded by Labour with higher benefits. In contrast, those who
have performed the invaluable public service of making up for the above labour
market inflexibility by getting a series of short term jobs will be penalised.
The stench
arising from that proposal almost equals the stench arising from the money laundering carried out by
Labour prior to the last general election: they gave about £20m to various
trade unions allegedly for “training”. And those same unions by a remarkable
coincidence then gave about £10m to the Labour Party.
And the
stench from that about equals the stench arising from bankster contributions to
the Tory Party.
1. Article
entitled “Labour looks at help for ‘strivers’.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Post a comment.